<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Access at LITA Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://litablog.org/2005/08/30/internet-access-at-lita-forum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/30/internet-access-at-lita-forum/</link>
	<description>Library and Information Technology Association</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: smith</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/30/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-2584</link>
		<dc:creator>smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-2584</guid>
		<description>I’d say we’re now on the cusp of being able to exclude hotels that don’t have fair pricing for reasonable connectivity. Since the Forum sites get picked a couple years in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d say we’re now on the cusp of being able to exclude hotels that don’t have fair pricing for reasonable connectivity. Since the Forum sites get picked a couple years in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Dowling</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/30/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Dowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-267</guid>
		<description>According to Mary Taylor of LITA, you can get access in your room and then ask at the registration desk for a code that give you wireless access in the meeting rooms.  Apparently our squeaky wheels got some grease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Mary Taylor of LITA, you can get access in your room and then ask at the registration desk for a code that give you wireless access in the meeting rooms.  Apparently our squeaky wheels got some grease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Dowling</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/30/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Dowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 18:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-189</guid>
		<description>To modify Roy's comments slightly, I'd say we're now on the cusp of being able to exclude hotels that don't have fair pricing for reasonable connectivity.  Since the Forum sites get picked a couple years in advance, they've usually been unable to say what they would or could offer by the time the Forum rolled around, and we've tended to cut them slack.

Also, [non-free] connectivity costs for Forum-wide use means making non-connected attendees subsidize the connection.  Until recently, this was a sufficiently large percentage that Forum planners didn't want to do that.

IMO, both of these have become non-issues and LITA should insist on Forum-wide connectivity.  Now, point of order: does the Board have insist on this and give the office permission to turn down hotels that are otherwise acceptable but won't play nice about wireless?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To modify Roy&#8217;s comments slightly, I&#8217;d say we&#8217;re now on the cusp of being able to exclude hotels that don&#8217;t have fair pricing for reasonable connectivity.  Since the Forum sites get picked a couple years in advance, they&#8217;ve usually been unable to say what they would or could offer by the time the Forum rolled around, and we&#8217;ve tended to cut them slack.</p>
<p>Also, [non-free] connectivity costs for Forum-wide use means making non-connected attendees subsidize the connection.  Until recently, this was a sufficiently large percentage that Forum planners didn&#8217;t want to do that.</p>
<p>IMO, both of these have become non-issues and LITA should insist on Forum-wide connectivity.  Now, point of order: does the Board have insist on this and give the office permission to turn down hotels that are otherwise acceptable but won&#8217;t play nice about wireless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Boule</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/30/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Boule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-187</guid>
		<description>I hesitated for awhile to post this information, hoping that LITA would come up with a reduced price. Alas, it was not to be. There is still time though for someone in the powers that be to work their magic (I hope). Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hesitated for awhile to post this information, hoping that LITA would come up with a reduced price. Alas, it was not to be. There is still time though for someone in the powers that be to work their magic (I hope). Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtennant</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/30/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>rtennant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I think it's time for LITA to not schedule events at hotels that charge outrageous rates to provide wireless connections during a meeting. By this I mean not outrageous rates to individuals, but outrageous to the organization, which I believe should be making sure wireless connectivity is simply part of the assumed conditions. I mean, if LITA can't pull this off, what chance does the rest of ALA have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s time for LITA to not schedule events at hotels that charge outrageous rates to provide wireless connections during a meeting. By this I mean not outrageous rates to individuals, but outrageous to the organization, which I believe should be making sure wireless connectivity is simply part of the assumed conditions. I mean, if LITA can&#8217;t pull this off, what chance does the rest of ALA have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vautrin</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/30/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>vautrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-185</guid>
		<description>With all the presumed hackers attending, couldn't ALA/LITA set up a repeater via WDS for conference attendees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the presumed hackers attending, couldn&#8217;t ALA/LITA set up a repeater via WDS for conference attendees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
