<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Access at LITA Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://litablog.org/2005/08/internet-access-at-lita-forum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/internet-access-at-lita-forum/</link>
	<description>Library and Information Technology Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: smith</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-2584</link>
		<dc:creator>smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-2584</guid>
		<description>Iâ€™d say weâ€™re now on the cusp of being able to exclude hotels that donâ€™t have fair pricing for reasonable connectivity. Since the Forum sites get picked a couple years in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™d say weâ€™re now on the cusp of being able to exclude hotels that donâ€™t have fair pricing for reasonable connectivity. Since the Forum sites get picked a couple years in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Dowling</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Dowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-267</guid>
		<description>According to Mary Taylor of LITA, you can get access in your room and then ask at the registration desk for a code that give you wireless access in the meeting rooms.  Apparently our squeaky wheels got some grease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Mary Taylor of LITA, you can get access in your room and then ask at the registration desk for a code that give you wireless access in the meeting rooms.  Apparently our squeaky wheels got some grease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Dowling</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Dowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 18:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-189</guid>
		<description>To modify Roy&#039;s comments slightly, I&#039;d say we&#039;re now on the cusp of being able to exclude hotels that don&#039;t have fair pricing for reasonable connectivity.  Since the Forum sites get picked a couple years in advance, they&#039;ve usually been unable to say what they would or could offer by the time the Forum rolled around, and we&#039;ve tended to cut them slack.

Also, [non-free] connectivity costs for Forum-wide use means making non-connected attendees subsidize the connection.  Until recently, this was a sufficiently large percentage that Forum planners didn&#039;t want to do that.

IMO, both of these have become non-issues and LITA should insist on Forum-wide connectivity.  Now, point of order: does the Board have insist on this and give the office permission to turn down hotels that are otherwise acceptable but won&#039;t play nice about wireless?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To modify Roy&#8217;s comments slightly, I&#8217;d say we&#8217;re now on the cusp of being able to exclude hotels that don&#8217;t have fair pricing for reasonable connectivity.  Since the Forum sites get picked a couple years in advance, they&#8217;ve usually been unable to say what they would or could offer by the time the Forum rolled around, and we&#8217;ve tended to cut them slack.</p>
<p>Also, [non-free] connectivity costs for Forum-wide use means making non-connected attendees subsidize the connection.  Until recently, this was a sufficiently large percentage that Forum planners didn&#8217;t want to do that.</p>
<p>IMO, both of these have become non-issues and LITA should insist on Forum-wide connectivity.  Now, point of order: does the Board have insist on this and give the office permission to turn down hotels that are otherwise acceptable but won&#8217;t play nice about wireless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Boule</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Boule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-187</guid>
		<description>I hesitated for awhile to post this information, hoping that LITA would come up with a reduced price. Alas, it was not to be. There is still time though for someone in the powers that be to work their magic (I hope). Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hesitated for awhile to post this information, hoping that LITA would come up with a reduced price. Alas, it was not to be. There is still time though for someone in the powers that be to work their magic (I hope). Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtennant</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>rtennant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s time for LITA to not schedule events at hotels that charge outrageous rates to provide wireless connections during a meeting. By this I mean not outrageous rates to individuals, but outrageous to the organization, which I believe should be making sure wireless connectivity is simply part of the assumed conditions. I mean, if LITA can&#039;t pull this off, what chance does the rest of ALA have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s time for LITA to not schedule events at hotels that charge outrageous rates to provide wireless connections during a meeting. By this I mean not outrageous rates to individuals, but outrageous to the organization, which I believe should be making sure wireless connectivity is simply part of the assumed conditions. I mean, if LITA can&#8217;t pull this off, what chance does the rest of ALA have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vautrin</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/08/internet-access-at-lita-forum/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>vautrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=106#comment-185</guid>
		<description>With all the presumed hackers attending, couldn&#039;t ALA/LITA set up a repeater via WDS for conference attendees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the presumed hackers attending, couldn&#8217;t ALA/LITA set up a repeater via WDS for conference attendees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

