<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Books List: An Open Source Software Case Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://litablog.org/2005/09/30/the-new-books-list-an-open-source-software-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://litablog.org/2005/09/30/the-new-books-list-an-open-source-software-case-study/</link>
	<description>Library and Information Technology Association</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shoughton</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/09/30/the-new-books-list-an-open-source-software-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>shoughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=113#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Michael, for the correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Michael, for the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Doran</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/09/30/the-new-books-list-an-open-source-software-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=113#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Just a slight correction -- the application was not released with a GNU General Public License, but with an alternate license provided by the university.  One of the points of the session was that decisions on what license is used is generally not up to the individual who creates the software; it is decided by the university's intellectual property office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a slight correction &#8212; the application was not released with a GNU General Public License, but with an alternate license provided by the university.  One of the points of the session was that decisions on what license is used is generally not up to the individual who creates the software; it is decided by the university&#8217;s intellectual property office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
