<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: danah boyd and Michael Gorman slug it out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://litablog.org/2005/10/05/danah-boyd-and-michael-gorman-slug-it-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://litablog.org/2005/10/05/danah-boyd-and-michael-gorman-slug-it-out/</link>
	<description>Library and Information Technology Association</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ksclarke</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/10/05/danah-boyd-and-michael-gorman-slug-it-out/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>ksclarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=145#comment-662</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lissa Klein</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/10/05/danah-boyd-and-michael-gorman-slug-it-out/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Lissa Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 03:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=145#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Instead of crabbing about Google and the other search engines why don't you fix the online catalogs used at most libraries, public and academic.  There is no reason in this day and with current technology to have to remember when a subject is filed under 'History - British' or 'British - History' or 'Britian, History' and that is a simple example.  I suggest a little flexibility, some boolean functionality, and results listed by publication date or author not just title.  You might even allow users to contribute when they have additional information or corrections to the catalog. There are many things the POT needs to do before discussing the complexion of the KETTLE.
Lissa - MLS '73 never practiced due to market. 30+ years in data processing but still following the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of crabbing about Google and the other search engines why don&#8217;t you fix the online catalogs used at most libraries, public and academic.  There is no reason in this day and with current technology to have to remember when a subject is filed under &#8216;History - British&#8217; or &#8216;British - History&#8217; or &#8216;Britian, History&#8217; and that is a simple example.  I suggest a little flexibility, some boolean functionality, and results listed by publication date or author not just title.  You might even allow users to contribute when they have additional information or corrections to the catalog. There are many things the POT needs to do before discussing the complexion of the KETTLE.<br />
Lissa - MLS &#8216;73 never practiced due to market. 30+ years in data processing but still following the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robot Librarian &#187; Crappy search and the New Gatekeepers</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/10/05/danah-boyd-and-michael-gorman-slug-it-out/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Robot Librarian &#187; Crappy search and the New Gatekeepers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=145#comment-388</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the themes that came up a few times at LITA was the cliche of Librarian as Gatekeeper. dana boyd and Michael Gorman had decidedly different takes on it, and the former hinted at a different way of thinking about the issues. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the themes that came up a few times at LITA was the cliche of Librarian as Gatekeeper. dana boyd and Michael Gorman had decidedly different takes on it, and the former hinted at a different way of thinking about the issues. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genny</title>
		<link>http://litablog.org/2005/10/05/danah-boyd-and-michael-gorman-slug-it-out/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Genny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 00:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://litablog.org/?p=145#comment-341</guid>
		<description>I'll follow on the &lt;strong&gt;remix&lt;/strong&gt; topic with a pointer to &lt;a href="http://business2.blogs.com/business2blog/2005/10/vinod_khosla_fo.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Vinod Khosla's remarks on the remix generation&lt;/a&gt; in the Business 2.0 blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll follow on the <strong>remix</strong> topic with a pointer to <a href="http://business2.blogs.com/business2blog/2005/10/vinod_khosla_fo.html" rel="nofollow">Vinod Khosla&#8217;s remarks on the remix generation</a> in the Business 2.0 blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
